Systemization of work as a process

Dunja Labović Begović, Andrej Raspor
Download PDF

Modern systemization of work must become a process just as other organizational processes monitored by it. The purpose of our research was to create an SWP model (systemization of work as a process model) for knowledge-based business functions, which will be useful in practice and will make it possible to organise work on the basis of employee competencies and to form salaries on the basis of effective work time, and complexity and quality of work. During research we designed an SWP model and presented how to determine the complexity of tasks based on the required competencies, the criteria for determining the quality of work and the method of recording effective work. The designed SWP model is the key contribution of research to science and the added value; it makes it possible to organize work on the basis of employee competencies and to form salaries on the basis of complexity of work, effective work and adequate quality of work. By changing the systemization from an organizational act to a process it is possible both to keep track of changes in the work process promptly and to form employee salaries on the basis of effective work, complexity of work and quality of work.

Keywords
competencies | complexity of task | effective work time | salary | SWP model | systemization of work | systemization of work as a process
https://doi.org/10.3359/oz1712015

Related Posts

22. 6. 2020
Cataloguing, Computer science and informatics, Social science and humanities

Digital humanities: a whim or a (bibliographical) routine?

Sonja Svoljšak

    The article presents and analyses selected digital humanities projects and research initiatives in which libraries and other heritage institutions participate actively. These ambitious global projects supplement the existing knowledge on general and specific social and cultural-historical phenomena in the field of written cultural heritage with the help of web-based applications, tools and the collaborative location-independent research approach.

    Continue reading

    31. 12. 2016
    Social science and humanities

    Structural crisis of copyright, part 2

    Tvrtko-Matija Šercar

      Avtorska pravica je vrsta intelektualne lastnine. Beseda “avtorska pravica” ni najbolj posrečen prevod izraza “copyright” (pravica do kopiranja izvoda), hkrati pa je tudi zavajajoča, kot da bi bil osrednja oseba avtor, ne pa imetnik pravice do kopiranja. Avtor je vsekakor imetnik moralne avtorske pravice, vendar je zelo redko tudi imetnik materialnih pravic. Moralne avtorske pravice nimajo tržne vrednosti in so s stališča družbenega sistema, v katerem šteje le denar, nepomembne. Stališče do avtorske pravice je odvisno tudi od poslovnega modela, kot sta npr. model “dolgega repa” ali model “zastonj”.

      Continue reading

      30. 6. 2016
      Education, Social science and humanities

      Information resources in the academic environment

      Beba Ešrefa Rašidović

        Learning and knowledge acquisition with new forms of learning in the education process is based on one”s construction and deconstruction of meaning and the learner”s interaction with the world in a certain social and cultural environment. Each person is responsible for their own learning and how to manage it. As active learning is based on independent and active engagement in the teaching and learning process, finding and gathering information from various sources is an important part of any form of learning and teaching, particularly in the academic environment.

        Continue reading

        30. 6. 2016
        Social science and humanities

        Structural crisis of copyright, part 1

        Tvrtko-Matija Šercar

          Copyright is a type of intellectual property. Not only is the Slovene term “avtorska pravica” (author’s right) not the best translation of the term copyright (i.e. the right to copy an item), it is also misleading, as if the central person is the author and not the holder of the right to copy something. While the author is undoubtedly the holder of the moral copyright, he is rarely also the holder of the material rights. Moral copyright has no market value and is insignificant from the perspective of a social system where only money counts. The attitude towards copyright also depends on the business model, e.g. “long-tail” or “freechange”.

          Continue reading