Protislovja vrednotenja znanstvenega dela: Kako določiti pravo znanstveno založbo?

The paper analyes model of evaluation of monographic scientific publications as proposed in Slovene Regulations on evaluation of scientific achievcements. The paper points out that Regulations failed to grasp the inner dynamics of contemporary publishing industry; as a consequence, the works pubished by publishing services are threated as equall to monographies published by serious scientific publishers that are not included on the list of scientific publishers as proposed in Regulations Therefore, Regulations widely open door to subjective judgements and do not allow serious evaluation of scientific publications. The author points out that one of the main reasons for such state of affairs could be find in the fact that the team that prepared Regualtions did not include specialists for evaluation and organization of knowledge.


Volume (number):


Article number:
31. 3. 2005
Share This